You are viewing the site in preview mode

Skip to main content

Table 5 Odds ratio of impacting factors for NAFLD

From: A correlation study of the relationships between nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and serum triglyceride concentration after an oral fat tolerance test

Variables Unstandardized Coefficient (B) SE Odds ratio (95% CI) P value
Model 1
 BMI 0.39 0.04 1.48 (1.37–1.61) < 0.001
 WC 0.13 0.01 1.13 (1.10–1.16) < 0.001
 TC 0.40 0.10 1.50 (1.23–1.82) < 0.001
 TG 0.74 0.11 2.09 (1.67–2.61) < 0.001
 TG 2 h 0.68 0.09 1.97 (1.65–2.35) < 0.001
 TG 4 h 0.46 0.06 1.59 (1.41–1.79) < 0.001
 TG 6 h 0.37 0.05 1.45 (1.31–1.60) < 0.001
 HDL-C −2.37 0.42 0.09 (0.04–0.21) < 0.001
 LDL-C 0.73 0.14 2.07 (1.56–2.73) < 0.001
 FBG 1.00 0.15 2.72 (2.03–3.65) < 0.001
 FINS 0.21 0.02 1.23 (1.17–1.29) < 0.001
 HOMA-IR 0.81 0.09 2.24 (1.88–2.67) < 0.001
Model 2
 BMI 0.40 0.04 1.49 (1.37–1.62) < 0.001
 WC 0.15 0.02 1.17 (1.13–1.21) < 0.001
 TC 0.38 0.11 1.46 (1.18–1.81) < 0.001
 TG 0.69 0.11 2.00 (1.60–2.49) < 0.001
 TG 2 h 0.66 0.09 1.94 (1.62–2.32) < 0.001
 TG 4 h 0.44 0.06 1.55 (1.37–1.76) < 0.001
 TG 6 h 0.21 0.05 1.42 (1.28–1.56) < 0.05
 HDL-C −2.51 0.46 0.08 (0.03–0.20) < 0.001
 LDL-C 0.69 0.15 1.99 (1.47–2.69) < 0.001
 FBG 0.94 0.16 2.56 (1.88–3.47) < 0.001
 FINS 0.22 0.03 1.25 (1.19–1.31) < 0.001
 HOMA-IR 0.82 0.09 2.28 (1.90–2.72) < 0.001
Model 3
 TG 2 h 0.76 0.17 2.14 (1.53–3.00) < 0.001
 TG 4 h 0.34 0.10 1.41 (1.16–1.72) < 0.05
 TG 6 h 0.21 0.07 1.23 (1.06–1.43) < 0.05
  1. Model 1-Crude OR; Model 2- Adjusted age and gender; Model 3- Adjusted age, gender fasting triglyceride and BMI
  2. Abbreviations: BMI body mass index, WC waist circumference, FBG fasting blood glucose, FINS fasting plasma insulin concentration, HOMA-IR homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, TG2 h triglyceride 2 h postprandially, TG4 h triglyceride 4 h postprandially, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, 95% CI 95% confidence interval